A Labour councillor who was forced to quit as a school governor after insisting that ISIS did not exist has now been elected to a council committee dealing with radicalisation.
Safia Akhtar Noor was suspended by Yew Tree Community School in Birmingham following numerous Facebook posts in which she disputed whether ISIS was to blame for terror attacks.
Even though the school suspended her and she later quit, she was allowed to stand for Labour in May’s local elections and gained a place in the Small Heath ward with more than 3,000 votes.
Birmingham council has now appointed a questionable Muslim Labour member who has previously declared that the Islamic State does not exist and has rejected Islamist attacks to a committee tasked with protecting children from radicalisation and terrorism.
On the day of the attack in March last year, she wrote: “Can people stop fighting on Facebook? Sadly people died in Westminster today but people die every day in Syria, Palestine, Africa, Rohingya, Kashmir. Need I carry on?!! Grow up and stop pointing fingers!”
Five days later she claimed in another message: “So someone got stabbed after the attack last week as a result of media and government claiming that SO CALLED ISIS HAD CLAIMED RESPONSIBILITY.”
She continued: “There is no ISIS and there is no proof.”
ISIS strives to forge an Islamic state called a caliphate across Iraq, Syria and beyond. The group executes Sharia Law, rooted in eighth century Islam, to build a culture that reflects the region’s ancient history.
ISIS is recognised for murdering dozens of people at a time and carrying out public killings, executions and other acts and ISIS use advanced devices like social media to support reactionary politics and religious basis. Fighters are devastating holy sites and valuable artefacts even as their leaders deliver a return to the ancient days of Islam.
In 2014, ISIS dominated more than 34,000 square miles in Syria and Iraq, from the Mediterranean coast to south of Baghdad. At the end of 2016, ISIS territory had shrivelled to about 23,320 square miles, according to IHS Jane’s.
In 2015, ISIS was thought to be keeping 3,500 people as captives. Most of the imprisoned were women and children from the Yazidi population, but some were from other racial and holy minority communities but ISIS’s income comes from oil stock and stealing, taxes, payoffs from abductions, selling stolen artefacts, extortion and regulating crops.
The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, better known as ISIS, claimed liability for the November 13 terrorist assaults in Paris but according to Safia Akhtar Noor ISIS doesn’t exist, well, I guess she could be right, which would suggest that the British government are misleading the people.
And now Safia Akhtar Noor has been selected for the council committee dealing with radicalisation.
Even with lack of proof, you can still make people think that it was there or it did happen and even if we don’t know it exists, it doesn’t mean it doesn’t. It just implies we don’t know one way or the other and we really haven’t been made aware of it yet, so it’s not part of our consciousness except if it’s in the media, but that still doesn’t mean it’s a reliable source.
Arguments are from ignorance and it states that a statement is true because it has not yet been proven false or a statement is false because it has not yet been proven true and this depicts a kind of fake dichotomy in that it omits a third choice, which is that there may have been an insufficient investigation, and hence there is inadequate knowledge to prove the hypothesis be both true or false.
Arguments that appeal to ignorance rely merely on the fact that the veracity of the proposition is not disproved to arrive at a definite conclusion. These arguments fail to appreciate that the limits of one’s understanding or certainty do not change what is true.
They do not inform upon truth. That is, whatever the truth is, it does not wait upon human thought or investigation to be formed. Reality exists at all times, and it exists freely of what is in the mind of anyone.
Despite this, the law student was able to stand as a Labour candidate in Theresa May’s local elections in the Small Heath ward which has a majority Muslim community and won with more than 3,000 votes and now, she’s been appointed to the Children’s Social Care Overview and Scrutiny Committee of the Labour-controlled council.
The body looks over initiatives to stop radicalisation and extremism and has given guidance on the Prevent strategy, designed to prevent people being enticed into terrorism and it’s shocking to think that the Labour administration would select Councillor Akhtar, of all the ones free, to this scrutiny committee.
Even though she’s atoned for stating her social media postings should have been scripted more thoughtfully, but they still represent her beliefs. Well done to Councillor Akhtar for demonstrating those beliefs, but if she wants to parade her opinions that much, maybe she should give up her day job and become an activist, that might be more instrumental for her.
And considering that the school at which she was a governor suspended her, stating her remarks violated its code of conduct, it beggars belief that Labour believes it fitting for her to manage the safeguarding of children, including protecting them from the threat of radicalisation.
According to a study by The Henry Jackson Society from March last year, one in ten UK Islamic revolutionaries have been sentenced and have come from the Sparkbrook area of Birmingham, which is ten minutes from Small Heath and the Labour-run Birmingham City council Europe’s largest local authority has been continually cited of turning a blind eye to extremism, including throughout the Trojan Horse scandal, when extremist Muslims imposed their agenda on state schools.
There’s not even the slightest bit of pretence anymore and the government see’s the UK’s native children as meat on the hoof, fit to generate taxes. Taxes which are to be given for logs on the UK’s funeral pyres and to pay the bills of the new overlords.
What is to become of our average law-abiding taxpayer?
It appears that our average law-abiding taxpayer doesn’t have the freedom to say no anymore except if they want to be dragged into an alley and attacked and the government appears to only understand one thing and one idea and that idea is to protect its narratives through the control of force.
Evidently, it appears that some people of faith lie to those who don’t believe and countless politicians appear to cast in the same mould but where there is a preponderance of Muslim people they will choose a Muslim because they’re in there to blend in and to penetrate and establish themselves.
Imagine a 100,000 native Christian Brits moving to an enclave of Pakistan, and voting in their own kind, there would be carnage, yet, we are told that we’re the bigoted ones.
But we English are a strange lot, in that, we are very lazy in expressing concern and fear. When we detect smoke, it’s not until the drawing room curtains are burning away and the fire brigade is tearing down the front door, that we scream, fire!
They’re educating some of our children to become followers of Islam, they’re ruining your children, and they’re taking your houses and it’s time for somebody to scream fire!
But we can be prosecuted and sentenced for saying offensive words about Muslims, it’s described as Hate Crime yet they have violated white underage English girls, while the government have snubbed it, and not one of their cases that have eventually gone to court has been classified as a Hate Crime.
But our politicians know that if they say anything, their own families, children, wives et cetera will instantly become the victims. The Muslims here dictate by numbers, intimidation and fear of their family members being hunted, abused and butchered.
Saying that there are countless Muslims that are respectable law abiding citizens and would give you the shirt off their backs and we shouldn’t tar every Muslim with the same brush and they work long hours giving back to the community, unfortunately, our government has insisted that all Muslims are the same.
Muslim is a term and as soon as we hear that term we instantly think terrorist because our government have introduced that term in our minds as terrorists. There are extremists that happen to be Muslim but not all Muslims are extremists, there’s a huge difference.
But when Safia Akhtar Noor states there’s no ISIS, people instantly think terrorist again and Muslim. They may as well put that in the Oxford dictionary “Terrorist” and then underneath “Muslim.” Which brings me to something else pretty disturbing, has Safia Akhtar Noor been elected to a council committee dealing with radicalisation so that people think terrorist and Muslim again, it’s a mindblowing twist.
All hate crimes should be punishable, we have zero tolerance for bullying and we should have the same for hate crimes. We demand that Muslims and other cultures that come to our country follow the law and that’s acceptable, what is not acceptable is when a British person thinks that it’s acceptable to launch a slice of bacon at a Muslim.
Just before the turn of the century, we had the sizeable immigration of Jewish people in England and even though we didn’t have Jewish extremists (the government at that time weren’t clever enough to foil that idea) in England, they were persecuted like Muslims are being victimised now.
Then we had World War II and masses of Jews got wiped out, hey, World War III is on its way! Only this time it will be called a Satanic bloodbath…
The only thing we fear is fear itself. The government put fear into us and it paralyses us and this is just the country of stupid stunts and there are many other nationalities that work in England but they’re not oppressed as much as Muslims are, the difference is this, Muslims are of a different colour, whereas a Polish person in England is white which means we don’t really discriminate on faith at all, we discriminate on colour and us Brits don’t like change or anything out of the norm.
In fact, Allah is the terrorist, not the Muslims themselves. The Qur’an says that they should cast terror into the hearts of those who become infidels and that’s all fine and dandy in their country of origin, where they can do what they like, they can cut off their heads and fingers, there’s no problem with that.
But here in England the laws are different and we’ve been pretty easy going with them, we have permitted them to erect mosques so that they can pray. We allow them to wear their own attire but what we didn’t invite into our country was extremist groups that believe they can lord over our country.
Unfortunately, we’ve put the wolves in charge of the henhouse.
Are most victims of terrorism Muslim?
It’s tempting for countless people who try and turn this question into a scorecard, attempting to figure out which religious groups are more extreme than others and it boils down to this grossly distorted keeping score, like it’s a football match.
The United Kingdom has become a bizarre world and it’s now shifted into a Looney Tunes Land.