Despite the reiterated persistence of women for years that the contraceptive pill has an adverse impact on their mental and physical health, the first extensive research on how hormonal birth control affects women’s well-being has just been published.
The research, led by the Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, discovered that, unsurprisingly, oral contraceptives reduce general well-being in healthy women.
The double-blind research used 340 healthy females aged mid 18 and 35 over the course of three months and treated them randomly with either placebos or contraceptive pills. The latter contained Ethinylestradiol and Levonorgestrel, the most common form of the contraceptive pill in Sweden and several other countries.
Despite nobody knowing which pills were supplied to which females, those who were given contraceptive pills rated their quality of life to be lower. This was across areas of mood, well-being, vitality, and self-control, all of which were affected negatively.
Surprisingly, no notable rise in depressive manifestations was apparent.
The research notes that these differences were insignificant, however, that they may be of clinical value. The conclusion that the pill negatively alters women’s well-being is unsurprising, and the fact that it has taken so long, despite a form of the pill being available since 1960, is not.
Regardless, as of late, the investigation is accumulating. A study by JAMA determined that the use of hormonal contraception, particularly amongst teenagers, was associated with subsequent use of antidepressants and diagnosis of depression.
Earlier this year, The Debrief published a study called Mad About The Pill, looking in particular at the adverse mental side effects of the oral contraceptive pill. They discovered that whilst numerous females reported a rise in depression, stress, and panic attacks whilst on the pill, they didn’t feel they were taken seriously when they described these symptoms to their doctor.
The results of The Debrief’s study, overall, are rather dreadful, however, they don’t come as any sort of surprise to those who have been prescribed birth control.
There are various kinds of hormonal birth control, and some teens have been on the pill since they were 15 years old. Many are not prescribed it for contraceptive reasons, but also to control periods or for acne.
Relevant or not, one wouldn’t say that those women would describe their mental health or well-being as great, and the outcome of nearly ten continuous years of hormonal contraceptives on a body is staggering, and when some women have voiced their views to their doctors and questioned if it would be smart to have a rest, the doctor simply waves off their concerns.
Some females originally were on the contraceptive jab and quit since it made them aggressive for no reason throughout the first few weeks, and was later informed that the mini pill would be more reliable.
Understandably, virtually all medications come with side effects, some more than others, however, some of those side effects can be catastrophic on a person’s body, and it’s the translation from the person taking that medicine and how it is affecting them that the doctor should be taking note and not waving them off with some justification.
Everyone’s body is diverse and consequently, we respond to these medications in various ways and doctors should not be playing a deduction game, they should be informed of the facts before dishing out prescriptions.
How long does it take to make a doctor? Currently, doctors in the United Kingdom can train for up to 16 years before qualifying. 5 years for their degree, or six if you intercalate and take a beneficial topic like, say, History of Medicine, 2 years for a post-graduate foundation course, and then 3 to 8 years in specialist training.
Pharmacists train for five years, one year less than a doctor and a year more than a nurse. So pharmacists were said to be enlisted into GP practices to further reduce demand and combat a lack of family doctors.
The plans could see pharmacists placed in surgeries to further meet the day-to-day requirements of patients with long-term infirmities, including diabetes and asthma.
It appears like a great plan since doctors know about medical stuff and pharmacists know about medications and their side effects, well seemingly so. Tons of medicine is given out by doctors, most of whom look in a book before they give them to you since numerous doctors are not certain if they are giving out the correct medicine, or if it will interact poorly with a different medication that their patient is receiving.
We put our trust in our doctor and trust they know what they are doing but when your doctor is relating to a book on what medications they should be giving you, that doesn’t rest well, and we should be amazed at how numerous doctors don’t really know what medicine they are giving out to their patients.
It’s a little unsettling indeed, yet they dismiss our concerns by assuring us that all medicine has side effects and that is quite right. Not that it should deter patients from taking their medicine because in some situations coming off their medicine could have really unfavorable consequences, but so could taking ones we don’t require as well.
Of course, some women previously had crappy mental health long before they popped any progesterone, but as The Debrief’s and several others present, it’s not the same for all females.
There are infinite studies, and heaps of anecdotal data accumulating that will hopefully provide the incentive for medical experts to consider more thoroughly about prescribing the pill, the impact it has on our brains and bodies, and a real long-term solution that won’t totally screw us up.
Of course, if it was men reporting in their thousands that they were suffering from a loss of energy, severe depression, tension, and overall bad well-being because of an extremely accessible and over-prescribed medicine, maybe we’d have seen sufficient investigation done sooner.
It is great that the contraceptive pill was introduced since it discouraged births that were not wanted, even down to sexual predators who violated, females were not getting pregnant by them.
It was the swinging sixties, and it may well have been okay to tune in, turn on and drop out in a flower power dress if you lived in London and visited Carnaby Street, however, for most girls in the provinces it was a tough slog to get GCEs and A-levels and possibly be the first in a family to get to university.
Becoming an unwed mum was an unpardonable crime. Some girl’s in school made the error and was ousted from school and rebuffed by her parents. Most teenagers were sent elsewhere and their newborns adopted.
This generation was only too conscious that propagation was an undeniable no-no. It would bring their dreams to an end, and in many cases, some mothers would have such a frozen fit and that teen might never be allowed to cloud her door again, a warning that my mother made on numerous an occasion. ‘Don’t you bring shame to this house, my girl,’ still reverberate in my ears.
However, sex was a different thing. Girls knew, generally, about the newly available Pill, a mythic medication, identified not by its trademark name but by the widespread general terminology ever used, simply The Pill.
It was approved in the United States on May 9, 1960. Inside three years, 2.3million American women were taking it and usage soon expanded throughout the Western world. Now it’s taken by more than 100 million women.
The creativity of the Pill corresponded with a cataclysmic turning point in British history. Even for those a significant distance from Swinging London, the sense of change filtered down.
Gone were the twinsets, pearls and stiletto heelpieces our mothers dressed in. Teenagers wanted mini skirts and Cuban heels. Chicks opposed their mothers’ demand of refined perms and wore their hair long, straight and in curtains on either side of their head.
Tommy Steele and Buddy Holly records went to the base of the pile and teenagers saved for weeks to afford the 6s 9d it required to obtain the newest single from The Beatles or Rolling Stones.
Furthermore, for the first time, significant amounts of teenagers, inspired by the quality of education and the burgeoning Women’s Movement, proposed to move home and design a profession. The modern girls of the late Sixties learned about the Pill that was being presented in the headlines and learned about it in magazines and papers.
However, officially it was not for us. It got to the United Kingdom in 1961, however, as in the United States, was open just to espoused females on prescription. Additionally, it cost two shillings a month, a tremendous cost on an allowance of £400 a year.
Although, as modern fans of Women’s Lib who desired to be free to make their own decisions about sexuality and they desired to be in charge, self-supporting of any man. No method of contraception was as efficient as the Pill, more than 99 percent efficient when taken accurately. Therefore, modern ladies desired it, but how were they to get it?
Lady Helen Brook, who worked for the Family Planning Association (FPA), was the first to demonstrate that contraception should be accessible to females who were not espoused. Lady Helen Brook started her job in the department in the Fifties when an investigation revealed an increase in premarital coital activity.
By 1960 the normal age of first coupling had dropped from 21 to 19. It’s presently 15, according to research conducted in 2000. In the Fifties, more than 250,000 single women were having unprotected sex every year.
They were usually, secretaries in their 30s and 40s and men in those days frequently utilized their secretaries as concubines, but these ladies had no means of getting hold of birth control information. They were dying at the hands of back-street abortionists.
The code of the FPA would not allow her to summon single ladies for advice, however, in 1964, two years following the loss of British birth control campaigner Marie Stopes, Lady Helen Brook started her own London clinic, the Brook Advisory Service, to do precisely that.
Nevertheless, for ladies furthest from the metropolis, deception was still required to get the Pill. In 1968 there was no Brook Clinic in Hull, where some were suffering a do-I-or-don’t-I predicament, however, Woolies did a great trade in inexpensive wedding bands.
A number of teenagers purchased one and rolled in at the district FPA as espoused women. Others purchased a fake engagement ring and manufactured about an imminent union.
It was dishonest, but it worked. These girls were not being extravagantly lewd, but they wanted the option, after all, many of them went to work, paid their way in the home, yet they were not entitled to have a say because if you had sex before you were partnered you were deemed a loose woman, no more than a whore.
However, it is really how one is regarded, how society regards us. Sex was discouraged and I would get a shove from my mum if I even petted a boy. The advantages of that era were that the sexual rebellion had given women the right to say yes, and the women’s campaign gave women the courage to say no, and the Pill made certain women never figured in the abortion or unwanted baby statistics.
The development of the Pill came out of an unusual mix of motives and ethical principles. The feminist campaigner Margaret Sanger was born in New York in 1879 to Roman Catholic parents, six years after Congress had enacted a statute preventing information about birth control as offensive.
Her mother had died aged 50 following 18 pregnancies, and Margaret Sanger is supposed to have faced her father at the grave and challenged him, declaring that he prompted her mother’s passing, from having too many babies.
Most females did not have the opportunity of getting an education. Only higher-class women would occasionally get a basic education in mathematics, writing, and reading. Children were thought of as property.
The father could do all that he desired with the child. He could savor the fruits of his labor, exploit him, et cetera, however, it was his duty to support him. Children were frequently abused, even to death sometimes.
Females had hardly any of the powers the men had in that time. Men were permitted to own property, including the woman and all of her legacy, they could get an education like most women couldn’t, and they could have a lot of jobs that women couldn’t.
It wasn’t until 1839, when Mississippi awarded women the freedom for women to own property with their husband’s consent, that women were permitted to own land.
Most of us have come to realize how different today’s society is that that of the 1800’s.
Men were the head of the house, though they were where off opposing hostilities or working. The average lifestyle of females in the 1800’s was sometimes considered a kind of slavery. The only thing females were required to do was to partner a man and then donate the rest of her life serving him.
If she remained single, she would be mocked by society, and when the female married a man, he then had a claim to all of her legacy and all the woman had.
The everyday life of a wife in late 1800’s through early 1900’s was pretty uniform. Get the kids up, make breakfast, clean the home, make luncheon/dinner, and if they lived on a farm they would mind the animals and sometimes help harvest the crops.
Furthermore, numerous women were quite religious and would go to church regularly. Where most women then found their spouse to be. Even some women were into politics and would have nonviolent walks for equality and be able to vote.
Women had few to no rights in the government and were deemed secondary. The principal goal was the generation of babies and cleaning the home, and they fought to break ideal concepts about how women should be.
An espoused woman had no separate identity from her spouse.
Pursuing professions and better educations had very few rights and if they did achieve it, it was for really low wage and no pension. To be a teacher meant you couldn’t be espoused or have a family.
Conditions in a classroom were shocking. Dark, packed, and it felt like a factory.
Teachers were extremely disciplined and had stringent rules to follow.
The familiar position of women in the late 1800’s throughout early 1900’s was a peculiar thing, such as when they were barely 15 throughout to their middle 20’s many women had their children and many of them.
Additionally, numerous women had numerous friends because of all there related difficulties in life. When they were in there groups many of them began social associations and literary clubs to discuss their feelings.
Ultimately, they also started to become more productive in their neighborhood such as calculating votes, serving in their church’s, and more started to go to college to study subjects for work.
Leading residents desired to address problems however, churches declined, so they built their own meeting hall, and the land was donated.
Reproduction in much of human antiquity has been a class action. The upper classes were encouraged to procreate as much as possible, and a female who was expecting or recuperating from delivery took the time to rest whilst attendants took charge of her and the baby.
The lower classes worked right up to and shortly following delivery, as they had to work to eat. The upper classes further had the latest medical knowledge at their fingertips, however, this wasn’t always such a good thing.
Class distinctions in pregnancy throughout the Renaissance period in 15th-century Florence, women were coupled as teenagers and usually had five to ten children, depending on if she endured delivery.
Delivery was so dangerous that a woman would make out her will as soon as she discovered she was expecting. An age-old technique of birth control was continued breastfeeding, which is nature’s way of spacing out babies.
Nevertheless, the practice amongst the upper classes was to farm out breastfeeding to wet nurses, which meant that the mother would quickly be pregnant again.
It was throughout the Renaissance that medical doctors started to take on a role in the delivery, though not without a fight. Women as a whole were screened and their bodies were covered with lots of clothing.
It was improper for any man to take a role in the private process of birth, and midwives did not want to give up their ability or expertise in the field. Midwives had knowledge on their side, doctors had the power that came with the title.
Consequently, most of the writings and information from that period come from leading doctors, and much of their information was guesswork.
Three women were expecting when they embarked on the Mayflower on its voyage to America. One child, Oceanus Hopkins, was born while on the journey and died during the first winter in Massachusetts.
Another, Peregrine White, was born shipboard off Cape Cod and lived to an old age. The third child was stillborn at Plymouth, the mother perished during the delivery. Such accounts were not at all surprising, as a woman’s probabilities of dying during delivery were between one and two percent for each birth.
If a woman gave birth to eight or ten children, her odds of eventually dying during delivery were rather great. The infant death percentage was even greater. The possibilities of a child dying before his fifth birthday were expected to be about 20 percent, depending on the neighborhood, but accurate documents are limited.
In addition to the dread of dying or the concern of the child dying, there was no pain medicine during labor, except for whiskey in some areas. In Puritan villages, pain throughout labor was God’s retribution for Eve and all women who came afterward.
Motherhood in early America was even more terrifying for slaves. Infant death amongst African and African-American slaves in the 18th century extended from 28-50 percent, and death in children below ten was 40-50 percent, owing to maternal starvation, exhaustion, illness, and lack of medical access.
Slave masters rebuked the mothers for infant mortality, and there is proof that some newborns were intentionally suffocated to spare the baby from a life of servitude, but other circumstances contributed considerably to the infant mortality rate.
Childbirth improved dramatically in the 19th century with the introduction of anesthetics. Dentist William Morton developed the application of ether for surgery in 1846. Obstetrician Sir James Young Simpson introduced chloroform as an anesthetic in 1847.
Queen Victoria used chloroform throughout her eighth birth in 1853.
The method of childbirth anesthesia spread swiftly afterward, despite objections from the priesthood, who insisted that labor pains were God’s will.
In 1914, a method called Twilight Sleep was developed, which involved morphine and scopolamine. The mother slept through labor, but the drugs further affected the newborn, and sometimes the baby didn’t breathe at all. The morphine further caused some mothers to die during labor.
Childbirth, though still an ordeal, is much safer now for mothers. Babies are much more likely to survive to adulthood, and widely accessible birth control gives women the right of choosing when and how many babies to have.
However, the difficult part comes after birth, supporting a family, which is more difficult every day.
We might be mad about the Pill, or the Pill might be making us go mad, and your birth control tablets can make you a little crazy, but by crazy, means an over-emotional mess who acts and responds to everything and later regrets and never really understands.
All teenagers have a moment in their life when they first contemplate going on birth control pills. At some point in your life, whether you’re 14-years-old or 26, you decide that you want to start having sex, but you don’t want to get pregnant.
And what better way to do that than going on the pill?
For some, the Pill is an almost safe medication to stop reproduction, but it is further utilized to control periods and while it can make you a little mad at times, it usually does the job it’s supposed to do. I guess it depends on your concept of safety or the side effects the Pill has on a woman.
However not everyone gets those side effects, and one Pill might be okay for one woman, but not for another, similar to any other medication that a doctor prescribes to you.
Not wanting to become pregnant is an incentive towards taking the Pill, since not everyone wants an unwanted fertilization and it’s absolutely not safe for the body to be having too many babies. We have options now and without those choices, undesired fertility would start to become overflowing once again.
I believe a woman needs to look at the for and against and then determine what is best for her, but all medications have consequences and it’s critical that we reflect on what we are putting into our bodies since the Pill can alter your state of mind, but so can any other medicine you are given.
If we are familiar with the facts, then we are completely acquainted and can then make the appropriate decisions, but if they remain unclear then we can’t make the best decisions, so we all need to be familiarized…