The government ascertains that a human being can survive on £72.40 a week if you are over 25, if you are younger than that, then evidently your necessities are small, and consequently you need less. However, the national minimum wage is £6.31 an hour if you earn a living, and that’s what a human being can survive on if they are over 25 and earn a living.
If one was working 5 days a week, earning £6.31 an hour, less tax and national insurance, it would still be more than a person gets on Jobseekers Allowance (JSA). Nevertheless, the government states that the national minimum wage is such corresponding to national living standards, however, according to national living standards JSA is less, so how can this be, should it not be the equivalent, according to national living standards.
Does this imply that if people on JSA are getting less, then their living standards should be less, and that the food and goods that they purchase will be less in the shops. I can only conjecture that people on JSA should retain cards that they can display in shops, and that gives them a percentage off anything they purchase, on account of, according to the government their living expenses are less, and that’s why they are given fewer funds. And if this is not the case, then they should be granted the equivalent sum of money in accordance with national living.
Poverty appears to be a way of life for nearly all people existing on limited funds that the government says we can live on, even those that do a day’s work, and working their guts out each day to make a scrap so that they can survive, but this is the story of our servitude. This is how it came to be, and you can eventually be free. Like all animals that we are, all human beings want to control, and make use of the resources around them.
At first, we essentially hunted and fished and ate off the land, but then something enchanting and terrifying took place in our minds. We became, solitary in the midst of the animals, scared of dying, and of the impending loss. And this was the start of a huge disaster, and an even exceptional potentiality. You see, when we became scared of dying, of harm, and incarceration, we became controllable, and so salable, in a way that no other resource could be.
The largest resource for any human being in control is not natural resources, or implements, or living things or land, but other human beings. You can scare an animal on account of, animals are scared of pain in the moment, however, you cannot scare an animal with a loss of liberty, or with pain or incarceration in the world to come, on account of, animals have very little sense of tomorrow.
You cannot intimidate a cow with torment, or a sheep with death. You cannot pivot a saber at a tree and yell at it to yield more fruit, or grasp a flaming torch to a field and command more wheat. You cannot get more eggs by intimidating a female chicken, however, you can get a human being to give you his eggs by intimidating him. Man-made agriculture has been the most lucrative, and ruinous occupation all through history, and it is now reaching its destructive peak.
Human society cannot be logically understood till it is examined for what it is: a set of farms where human farmers own human livestock. Some people get confused on account of, governments provide healthcare and water and education and roads, and so conceive that there is some good will at work. Nothing could be further from reality. Farmers grant healthcare and irrigation and training for their livestock.
Some people get confused on account of, we are allowed certain liberties, and so imagine that our government protects freedoms. However, farmers locate their harvest a specified distance away from each other to increase their yields, and will allow certain animals larger stalls or grazing land if it signifies they will yield extra meat and milk. In your country, your tax farm, your farmer allows you certain liberties not because he is interested in your freedoms, but because he desires to expand his returns.
Are you starting to recognize the nature of the cage you were born into?
Your few liberties are protected on account of. They are lucrative to your owners. The concept is to brainwash the young through government “schooling.”
As the wealth of democratic nations increased, government schools were universally forced upon in order to repress the thoughts and souls of the livestock. Then they went on, and turned citizens in opposition to each other through the opus of the dependent livestock.
It is extremely hard to control human beings directly through coercion, and where it can be accomplished, it remains cripplingly under fruitful, as can be seen in North Korea. Human beings do not reproduce well or yield efficiently in absolute confinement.
If human beings believe that they are free, then they will yield much more for their farmers. The best way to preserve this mirage of liberty is to put some of the livestock on the payroll of the farmer. Those cows that become dependent on the existing pecking order will then assault any other cows who point out the violence, hypocrisy and immorality of human ownership.
Freedom is servitude, and servitude is freedom.
If you can get the cows to attack each other whenever anyone brings up the realness of their situation, then you do not need to spend nearly as much time constraining them directly.
Those cows who become dependent upon the stolen largess of the farmer will destructively object any questioning of the virtue of human possession, and the intelligent and artistic social ranks, always and everlastingly dependent upon the farmers, will state, to anybody who calls for liberty from ownership: “You will harm your fellow cows.”
Livestock are kept confined by shifting the moral responsibility for the destructiveness of a powerful orderliness to those who call for true liberty. Whenever livestock becomes exponentially more fertile, you get an identical development in the number of farmers and their dependents.
The growth of the nation is at all times proportionate to the preceding financial liberties. Financial liberties formulate riches, and the riches allure more criminals and political freeloaders, whose greediness then destroys the financial liberties.
In other words, liberty metastasizes the malignancy of the nation. The government that begins with the smallest will be at all times and end up the greatest.
This is why there can be no viable and sustainable alternative to an absolutely free and tranquil society.
A society free from political leaders, free from human ownership, free from the violence of levying and statism. To be absolutely free is both extremely easy, and exceedingly hard.
We flee from the fear of our servitude on account of. It is unpleasant to see it directly. We skip around the rampage of our fading orderliness on account of, we dread the assaults of our fellow livestock.
However, we can only be retained in the cages we are not willing to observe.