This is what you get when you team up with the likes of the EU, although over the years it has been of some advantage to some people and, a shackle round the necks of others.
A wheelchair user was declined an ATOS evaluation for health and safety reasons and, was requested to depart from the building. Does this mean that anyone in a wheelchair or mobility scooter, or who walks with some type of frame or crutches will be considered a fire hazard?
If this is the argument, how on earth are people meant to have their assessments, or is this just another way of making sure that claimants are refused their money and, then they will receive a letter in the post stating that they did not attend?
Does this also mean that ATOS will be arranging home visits for people who are deemed a fire hazard?