Donald Trump Finds Himself At Odds


Donald Trump finds himself at odds with the CIA over the Russia hack story, and people are freaking out over it. However, is Donald wrong not to have confidence in the CIA, well the accounts are spotty, to say the least?


The CIA are alleging that the DNC hack did so much harm to the Hillary Clinton campaign from individuals with links to the Russian government. Of course, Donald Trump has stated that he doesn’t accept the report, which has led to a number of wild allegations that its unreasonable for the president-elect to question the reliability of the CIA.

The principal contention coming from intellectuals and government leaders is that the president has to believe the intelligence that comes from the CIA. Plus the reality that our current president-elect doesn’t trust the intelligence and that it’s dangerous for America.

This is unusual and ridiculous for a president-elect to state. Number one arguing what the CIA are telling to their principal customer, the president-elect. However, is it so unreasonable to question the reliability of the CIA?

It’s worth recognising that the CIA is a secret society, virtually unaccountable to the American people, that has tortured people illegally, has spent decades threatening governments throughout the globe, all the whilst misleading the American people whilst spying on their own Congress.


Like that moment in 2011 when John Brennan a long time CIA operative who now operates the agency, responded to a question about CIA drone strikes. Almost for the past year, there hasn’t been a single collateral death.

Deputy chief minister of Pakistan's Nort

Well, that’s flat out crazy. Just a few months previous, the CIA drone strike eliminated 50 people in Pakistan. The strike reportedly hit a tribal gathering of dignitaries that were there to determine a mining debate.

However, possibly the most shameless deceptions the CIA has used in the past few years have been linked to the agency’s practice of torture. The CIA essentially lied each single step of the way. Most of this was revealed when the Senate eventually published its torture report back in 2014.

The basic, most notable claim was on the successfulness of the intelligence gained during torture. For years, the CIA claimed that torture or ‘Enhanced Interrogation Techniques’ as they like to call it, led to strong, actionable information that prevented terrorist activity.

This claim turned out to be untrue. The story proved, that, in fact, torture produced no valuable information.

They were further deceiving the people on the sort of torture they were doing. For ages, it was thought that the extremely harsh method was waterboarding.


For those that don’t know what waterboarding is. Waterboarding is a method of water cruelty in which water is discharged over a piece of fabric enveloping the face and respiratory passages of an immobilised captive, causing the person to endure the feeling of suffocating.


However, it turns out they were further doing stuff like forced rectal feeding, standing on injured limbs, and threatening to rape the detainee’s mother. However, it doesn’t end there.

Whilst the Senate was preparing the torture report, the CIA was actually trailing on the Senate. Of course, at first, the CIA stated that the CIA was in no way spying on the SSCI or the Senate.

Before declaring that they did it and then atoning for it. I suppose it’s never too late now to say sorry.

So, the CIA first began torturing people in secret. Then they acknowledged they were, but they lied about the successfulness of that torture.

They further lied about the sort of torture they were doing. Furthermore, then they spied on the people who were investigating them for it.

Plus, this is only from the past 15 years ago or so. However, the CIA has been misleading to the American people for decades.


To choose just one instance out of several, the once director of the CIA, Richard Helms was convicted of misleading Congress on the agency’s part in the 1973 military overthrow in Chile, which overthrew the democratically elected President Salvador Allende and established the lengthy dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet.

Then there was the incident in 1982 when Congress established a statute that prevented the Reagan administration from toppling the Sandinista government in Nicaragua. Notwithstanding the reality that Congress, the true image of the American people, directed the government not to defeat the Sandinistas, the CIA, sustained clandestine actions upon them for years.

The entire situation blew up in the Iran-contra embarrassment of 1986. Therefore, it does appear possible that some parts of the Russian state were connected in DNC hacks, though we’ve observed rather little in the way of real, solid proof.

Although, we unquestionably shouldn’t be taking the CIA’s statement at face value, since if the CIA wore pants, those pants would be on fire.

The NHS Is In A Perilous Area


The crisis-hit NHS is in a crisis, it has been predicted, and the Labour leader will sound alarm bells for the health service when he approaches the Fabian Society in London. It arises after it was highlighted the impasse of tiny Jack Harwood, 22 months, who had to remain five hours in A&E with speculated meningitis.


When questioned if the NHS was in crisis, Prime Minister Theresa May said that she understood and it has been recognized that the NHS is under stress.

However, it’s not just under pressure, it’s under stress, anxiety, and concern, and not only that, it’s under assault. People fear that one day there will be no NHS, and it frightens them because we are under invasion as ultimately what will occur is that our government will respond, great, if you don’t like the way that its run, then we will change it over to privatisation, which is basically what they are starting to do presently.

They just require one thing to ensure the opportunity, and if we make too many ripples, then they have us in their grasp. Therefore, put up with it or else! Many will pout, and say, no they would never actually do that, but they will, and gradually and inevitably they are, directly under our very nose.

Anyways, who wants an NHS? For those that can manage with private health care, they’re okay, they don’t have to fret, however, for those that rely on the NHS, it’s really significant. Not only that, the NHS is an establishment that’s been about for a really long time. It might be a tad antiquated, but at least it’s there, even if we do whine and moan about it.

Although that’s the point, we shouldn’t have to moan and groan about it, if only the government put more cash into it, rather than depreciating the funds they put back into it since cutting funds kills men, women, and children daily.

You have to understand what’s going on with the NHS and to do that, you have to be one of those people who have to lie in A&E for hours on end before getting seen by a real doctor, and many are simply novices on A&E doing their internship, and sometimes it can be very hit and miss, you really have to be there to understand what’s going on.

On how countless hours these poor doctors and nurses have to operate, and when operating these multiple hours, then that’s when blunders are made. To serve this many sufferers coming into A&E, you have to extend your workforce, however, when there are no funds being given for such an extensive service, healing the sick, people that are ill, the weak of our community, that’s when you get a tang in your mouth since there are no rules of etiquette anymore.

We should be questioning Theresa May over the mess in the NHS and social care, the myriads of people waiting more than four hours at A&E and the million aging people not getting the social care they require, and the young people with mental health difficulties who don’t get the assistance and attention they require.

I speak about the National Health Service as it’s in a crisis zone. Furthermore, the people who operate Britain have been taking our country for a ride and have geared the system for themselves. Last year’s global political earthquake didn’t just come out of the blue, and there are many of us who have sensed the earthquakes increasing for years.

They’ve sutured our political system to shield the powerful, and they’ve put our nation in danger by taking us into destructive international hostilities, and they’ve rigged the economics and business practices to fill the pockets of their supporters.

They’ve cut taxes on the wealthiest, £70 billion from now till 2022, and lower pay and necessary assistance for the rest, and they’ve sold off our country’s assets and handed over public services to be drained by tax dodgers.

They’ve accumulated deficit whilst neglecting to reinvest in the jobs and industries of the tomorrow, and the truth is the system just doesn’t work for the large majority of people.

Petition Press Philip Green To Tackle BHS Pension


Former BHS workers and trade union delegates were to descend on the quarters of Sir Philip Green’s retail industry in an effort to push him to fulfill the £571 million shortfalls in the deflated department store chain’s pension scheme.

More than 100,000 people have signed a petition asking for the billionaire financier to meet his commitment to sort the scheme. The petition was to be given to Green’s Arcadia business on Wednesday by John Hannett, the general secretary of the shopworkers’ trade union Usdaw.

Green agreed to dispense with the difficulties confronting the pension scheme when he arrived before MPs in June. Nevertheless, he has declined to agree on a deal with the Pensions Regulator, which has presently started legal actions upon Green and Dominic Chappell, the previous proprietors of BHS.

Hannett told Green required to elevate more than £250 million into the scheme, which has more than 20,000 members, calling any less derisory. The priority is to see Sir Phillip do the appropriate thing and deliver on his word to sort the pension fund. If he desires to retrieve any reputational trustworthiness he must not argue his way out of his duties, he must make a complete offering and do it immediately. That is the least he can do for past staff, several of who gave their whole working career at BHS.


The petition was to be presented to Arcadia, which manages Topshop, Dorothy Perkins, and Miss Selfridge. This man’s selfishness is incredible. BHS collapsed in April leading to the decline of 11,000 positions and to the £571 million pension shortfall. A governmental inquiry into the death of the retailer discovered that BHS had been orderly robbed under Green and Chappell.

Green managed the company for 15 years until he sold it to Chappell, a three-time bankrupt, for £1 in March 2015. Green, his family, and additional BHS stockholders received at least £580 million from the retailer, whilst Chappell’s firm Retail Acquisitions was given a suspected £17 million.


However, whilst magnate Sir Philip continues at the centre of the BHS pensions hurricane, his wife has been busy developing a £10.6 million home fit for a Green. Lady Tina Green, 67, has been placing the finishing touches on a six-bedroom home in one of London’s most fashionable localities.


The home, filed to an offshore firm connected to Lady Green, has a rooftop bar, super-sized basement and glass roof. Supposedly the home will be available by March. It comes as former workers of BHS, which Sir Philip sold for £1 a year before its collapse, waits for news of the firm’s £570 million pensions crisis.


A source familiar to the Greens reported that Sir Philip and Lady Tina’s daughter Chloe, who turns 26 in March, could make the four-storey holding her London residence. It’s like a mansion and is being done out to an unbelievable standard, no cost forgiven. Lady Tina has been in command of doing up the home and has attended it to keep a tight eye on its development.

The idea is for it to be given to Chloe as her first proper home of her own, therefore Lady Tina wants to make certain all is perfect. Topshop debutante Chloe was given the keys to a flat near to the mansion on her 21st birthday. Her mum was then pictured at the new apartment in November. Developers have since been restoring it.

The home has servants areas in the basement. Architect designs presented to the district council in June reveal it presently has a lift and two dressing rooms.

In November 2014, the home was sold to Daniel Pittack, a close friend of the Greens, for more than £10million.

In 2015, ownership was shifted to British Virgin Islands-based Mottistone Holdings Ltd for about £100,000 more. A second address for the firm, in Monaco, was further then the recorded office for Lady Tina’s Green & Mingarelli Design.

Sir Philip declared the property project had noth­ing to do with him. When questioned if Chloe would live there, he replied that’s not true, and at this point, that is not established.

Labour’s Frank Field, chairman of the Work and Pensions Select committee, stigmatized the home “BHS Pensions House”.

This is completely offensive, the man has no remorse.

Giving his daughter a £10 million home as her first real home when most people are fighting to retain a roof over their heads, he is the most uncaring monstrosity of a man. Consequently selfish Green is at it again, and this bit of garbage is nevertheless being defended by his friends and chosen ones.

No matter what anyone says, he will never give any money back, nor lose his knighthood. There will be plenty of discussion and ridicule, however, it will all evaporate and be quickly overlooked. This guy should be ignored by everybody that ever knows him, to humiliate him into doing the correct thing.

The guy has no guilt and it really reveals the hatred he has for the people he previously employed. This has occurred previously with others and will occur again, and people like him constantly stash millions away for their future. Only he won’t lose any sleep since he will have made certain that not even the government can get his money.

Victoria Beckham Set To Receive An OBE


Victoria Beckham is set to get an OBE in the Queen’s New Year’s Honours list. The ex-Spice Girls vocalist applied fashion creator, remembered as Posh Spice, is supposed to be expecting an Order of the British Empire honour for assistance to fashion and charity work in this year’s schedule, which has not yet been published by Buckingham Palace.

The honour is estimated to come 13 years following her ex-Manchester United legend hubby David, 41, took his OBE for services to football. Victoria made her première with a tiny collection at New York Fashion Week in 2008.


Furthermore, mother of four, who spurted to fame with the Spice Girls in the 90s, has gone on to enjoy the tremendous victory as a fashion creator with A-lister devotees comprising Gwyneth Paltrow, Claire Danes and her friend Eva Longoria.

Her charity work is also said to have put her on the desirable schedule. Victoria, a goodwill representative for the Joint United Nations Programme UNAIDS, has fought tirelessly to raise recognition of concerns such as HIV and AIDS.

The fashion symbol, who has sons Brooklyn, 17, Romeo, 14, and Cruz, 11 and a five-year-old daughter Harper, was by David’s side when he collected his OBE at Buckingham Palace in 2003.

One does question despite everything how popular she would have really have turned out to be had she not wedded David Beckham. The union was the classic combination, and even though she had capital in her own right at the time, I’m convinced his money did not hinder her interest.

Furthermore, soon to show how far she has come, she is soon being awarded an OBE for services rendered. Well, who gave her all the pies, she must have imagined she was dreaming when she set her visions on old Davey boy.


She might be a goodwill representative for the Joint United Nations Programme UNAIDS but it’s easy to be so charitable when you have millions, the honour arrangement is an utter farce. One of the requirements of receiving this honour is secrecy. You are not supposed to tell people until it’s approved.

However, she would have understood that but is far too arrogant to understand manners or honour. One must feel sad for her. It must be a trick, they should be giving the OBE to that fellow from Salford, the taxi operator who did charity work for children in Syria, and gave his life for it.

He must be worthy of something, and his family too. Really, services to fashion, what will they consider next. She’s a millionaire, she can afford to be a charity worker, her hubby got an OBE for playing football, the Queen must like football, it surely can’t be the outfits that Victoria makes, well she don’t really make them, some unfortunate person makes them, probably for barely any money.

And Victoria’s PR crew revealed she is using the identical seamstresses, pattern cutters, and fabric makers as 45-year-old Mouret who designed the Galaxy dress, the hourglass silhouette that harkens back to the glamour of 1940s Hollywood.

What about the every day, unacknowledged heroes who fight in the war, where is their OBE, where is their honour for supporting a war effort that has nothing to do with them.

I bet she’s licking her lips and rubbing her hands together for the big day, but any self-respecting receiver of this so-called honour for this fashion symbol with her millions should promptly send it back.

Buried Feelin


Prince Harry still fights with his feelings almost 20 years following the loss of his mother, Princess Diana. In a new documentary, Prince Harry in Africa, the young prince opens up about his emotions regarding losing his mother when he was only 12. Princess Diana passed away in a car crash in 1997.

Prince Harry never actually dealt with what had really transpired, so there was a lot of buried feeling and he still doesn’t even want to imagine it. Prince Harry presently serves with several charities, including the mental health charity Heads Together and Sentebale, whose purpose is to stop and destigmatize HIV/AIDS.


When she was alive, Prince Diana served with comparable charities, so his time with Sentebale is even more unique to Prince Harry. He’s got a year off, so wants to do something very productive with his life, he wants to do something that makes his mother proud.


In the last year, Prince Harry took two HIV tests to better bring awareness to getting tested and held a charity performance with Coldplay at the 2016 International AIDS Conference. Princess Diana was a famously enthusiastic advocate of those battling the disease early on in the epidemic despite public concern and misunderstanding.

Most memorably, she embraced and clasped hands with victims without using gloves, becoming the leading royal to do so.

Circumstances have shifted for the prince, and he presently reveals he feels excited, fired up and fortunate enough to be in a situation to make a difference. The development came in two stages. The prince has previously credited his military training for giving him self-confidence, as well as his charity work in Africa.

Throughout the interview, the 32-year-old prince jokingly referred to himself as a ginger white prince, revealing that he wasn’t certain what to do when he originally arrived in Africa. Numerous years later, the prince continues to have a love interest with the region and even believes he can pass this admiration to his forthcoming children one day.

For Harry, he has this appreciation of Africa, and it will never die, and he hopes it will carry on with his children as well. This time last year the prince further talked about his mother’s passing indicating he was left with a cavernous void that could never be filled.

Talking about ultimately obtaining peace with the tragedy, Prince Harry stated he was constantly encouraged by Princess Diana’s determination to make a difference with her charity efforts. The fifth in line to the throne stated that he used to hide his head in the sand and let everything around him kind of tear him to bits.

He was fighting the system, and he didn’t want to be this person. His mother died when he was very, very young and he didn’t want to be in this position. Harry established the charity with Prince Seeiso of Lesotho’s royal family, who he met on his gap year, in memory of both their mothers.

To some degree, there is a lot of unfinished business, unfinished work his mother never finished. The prince stated it’s okay to suffer, but as long as you talk about it. It is not a weakness. Weakness is having a problem and not recognizing it and not solving that problem.

Prince Harry said, that a lot of people think if you’ve got a job, if you’ve got financial security, if you’ve got a family, you’ve got a house, all that sort of stuff, everyone seems to think that is all you need and you are absolutely fine to deal with stuff.

Prince Harry made his comments about his mother’s death as he talked, saying, that he really regretted not ever talking about it.

His mother was taken from him when he was really young, and at an extremely young age, so, of course, he was going to suffer, and it doesn’t matter who you are, what background you’re from, what job you do or how much money you have in the bank, you will still suffer.

Thirty-five years ago this week, London was en fete, and the rest of the United Kingdom and much of the world came to a standstill as Lady Diana Spencer promised to love, honor, but not obey, Prince Charles.

I had just moved into a new house with my parents, as I sat in front of our television set to observe the wedding like a total loon, I was 18 years old, and all I could remember was how beautiful Princess Diana looked in that beautiful dress that she was wearing, it was the fairytale wedding, and every girl my age watching it stared in wonder, and questioned if she would ever get a fairytale wedding just like Diana!

Her promises, like her wedding dress, her hair, and even her honesty, were under worldwide investigation. No surprise she fluffed her lines and messed up the Prince’s names, calling him Philip Charles instead of Charles Philip.

In hindsight, the mix-up seems another indication for a doomed marriage, along with the Prince of Wales’s famous whatever in love means to comment on the day of their engagement. This year, as in years past, there has been nothing to celebrate the date, July 29, but then, there has been precious little attention, anyway, of the contribution Diana made to the Royal Family and to the life of the country.

The race to remember her in the aftermath of her passing at the age of 36 in a Paris car crash, she would be 55 now, is but a remote thought. Only the very faithful of the Princess’s followers know of the Diana memorial walk, a seven-mile trail through four of London’s parks, marked with 90 plaques in the ground, or of the Diana memorial playground with its wooden pirate ship in Kensington Gardens.

There is further, of course, the memorial fountain, ridiculed by some as a glorified trench, in Hyde Park, where visitors cool their feet on hot summer days. This erasing of Diana by a vindictive Establishment has been a compelling narrative, supported in part by the near secrecy of the royals.

However, this week, Prince Harry, who collectively with his brother William have been the finest and most obvious monuments to the dead Princess, showing that the years of censorship are at an end.
But while his efforts were being praised as examples of Harry’s important qualities in championing forbidden subjects, and of his alteration from Prince of Knaves to Prince of Hearts, it was his thoughts on his mother that were being spoken about in Buckingham Palace hallways this week.

Long-time subjects were left in awe about the importance of the comments and why, nearly 19 years after Diana was killed in that high-speed car mishap, Harry should presently felt the time was right to open up about her.

Some, maybe cynically, were proposing that he may have a guilt complex over the manner of Diana’s airbrushing from royal history. He can scarcely be held responsible for that, though, over the years, her two sons decided to do little in the way of public displays towards her memory.

In 2000, he and William refused to attend the opening of the Diana playground, so near to their old home at Kensington Palace. Furthermore, until a decision was taken over the so-called fountain or water feature, they took a limited interest in the deliberation over a fitting permanent memorial.

This, of course, should not be defined as a disinclination to mourn their mother, they missed her despairingly, but rather a decision to keep their pain and their loss private. Nevertheless, there was one other over-riding constituent, a fear of agitating their father, and Camilla.

For a long time, they worried, and those around them worried, too, that everything they said about their mother could be misconstrued as somehow being critical of the Prince of Wales. The entire Diana subject was difficult, and their delicacy about saying anything was obvious.

They were frequently unsettled when their mother’s name cropped up, particularly when books about her came out, but there was this hesitation to say or do much.

Prince Harry would pitch a tantrum if anyone alluded to his mother’s name. At school, they could control it up to a point by limiting access to television, and, of course, at home with Charles at Highgrove, there were never any papers around.

Some propose that this outrage was because he felt something so private and personal as the death of his mother had been seized by the rest of the nation. Harry had a lot of emotional luggage and he was extremely delicate. In that way, he is very like Diana.

Furthermore, from time to time, he would speak about his mother, although cautiously. As early as 2002, when he was 18, he stated he wanted to do anything that evoked memories of her charity events, which, 14 years on, he has essentially done.

Remembering his night-time visits with William and the Princess to homeless projects and to visit sick children in the hospital, he stated clearly that he thought he had a lot of his mother in him. Just once has he actually abandoned caution, and that was in 2007 when he and William marked ten years following Diana’s death with a pop performance at Wembley and a memorial ceremony at the Guards Chapel at Wellington Barracks in Central London.

The performance was held on what would have been her 46th birthday, the service on the anniversary of her passing. Harry gave a touching eulogy.

He said William and himself could divide life into two parts. There were those years when they were granted with the real presence beside them of both their mother and father. Furthermore, there were the ten years following their mother’s death.

When she was living they simply took for granted her unique love of life, laughter, fun, and folly. She was their protector, friend, and guide. She was, quite honestly the best mother in the world. Although the ceremony left some questioning why an event to praise and commemorate Diana’s life left an acid punch of score-settling.

Suspicions began when many of the people familiar to the Princess were omitted from the guest menu, which, until a last-minute choice not to attend, included the Duchess of Cornwall.

At the time it was announced those not requested, who numbered Paul Burrell the Princess’s former butler, her minder Ken Wharfe and her private secretary Patrick Jephson, had been excluded because they had penned books and disclosed secrets.

The public notes that the Royal family like to be like hermits, and of course, their private time has nothing to do with us, but, are we not entitled to know the facts, acknowledging that they are our Sovereignty. Still, it’s not right to take pleasure of a situation, however, what we do know is that there is a lot of caper that goes on behind the ramparts of the palace, nobody is that squeaky clean.

Even ten years on, such an analysis appears improbable when those concerned revealed no confidences at all whilst the Princess was living. The boys were supposed to have designed the twin functions down to the last detail, and palace workers told the only other occasion on which they had been quite so involved was when it came to deciding which Army regiment to join.

However, since then, they have said little, though William’s determination to give his wife Kate his mother’s engagement ring and to include Diana as one of their daughter Charlotte’s names are expressive tokens of her. So what has precipitated Harry’s admission? According to one figure who knows him well, the Prince, who left the Army after ten years last June, has come to understand his destiny.

He understands that with his military career finished, the only thing left for him is what his mother did, charitable events.

As to why he should be bringing up his mother’s name, I presume it is because he has a bit of a guilt complex about how she has been remembered. He has nothing to be guilty about because we all mourn in various ways.

When my father died, I was so involved planning things that I never had an opportunity to mourn, but after I used to perch myself on the toilet and think about him and weep. That does not mean I was guilty of something, I just wanted to mourn in my own way, and apparently the toilet did it for me since it was a chance to get away from my family and simply remember my father.

Some might consider this a little odd, but hello I’m not flawless, I’m a human being, and so is Harry. Just because he is a Royal does not make him perfect, it makes him an individual in every way. Sometimes we must get some perspective in our lives, to do that, sometimes we must be distant from the people that love us, to think privately and to do this, sometimes we must be alone.

Harry appears to have done this and come out the other side, grasping precisely what he needs to do, and this is deserving. I can’t envision what it is like to lose a mother, I know what its like to lose a father, and that’s bad enough, but to lose a mother at such an untimely age, must not only be terrifying but must further mess a little with your head.

Not that I am assuming that Harry is nuts or anything like that, of course, he’s not, but there must have been times when he imagined he was losing his mind. He knows what he needs to do now, he knows what he’s got to do.

He can’t live in his mother’s footprints but he most certainly will because he will feel the necessity to carry on what she can’t. Like his mother, he has a sensitive mind, is tactile, too, and, like her, relates comfortably with people.

He is not scared to reveal his kindness. Reflecting a light onto neglected children throughout the globe appears a really straightforward thing for him to do. Finding a spouse to experience these globetrotting goals, however, is another matter.

With two serious courtships behind him, to Zimbabwean farmer’s daughter Chelsy Davy and to actress Cressida Bonas, Harry is no nearer to settling down. I’m certain he will find somebody eventually, that’s if the Royal family don’t find somebody for him, but love is no chortling thing, and when it arrives it will happen, there is no hurry, he wants to achieve his goals and dreams in his own time, and not everyone else’s.

In two months, he will be 32, the same age his father was when he married 20-year-old Diana Spencer. However, Charles has been cautious not to intervene in his son’s relations as he is very conscious of the influence he himself came under to wed Lady Diana.

This is one thing about Charles that I admire, at least he is a great father to his sons, and that is an excellent thing in my book. He has the experience not to get involved, and he has the ability to be there for his sons if they so need an ear, and that he does have!

I know that planned weddings are still in continuation, however, even though I do not favor them, I have come to realize that a lot of them work, but on the other side of the coin, many don’t work, and we are no longer in the dark ages, we should be allowed to decide on our own life partner.

Since that is precisely what it is, for life, not just for several minutes, they have to live with that person for the rest of their life, and if one is not satisfied with what has been decided for them, that can be like a prison decree.

Unlike William, whose fate is decided, Harry’s is not, and this is why he is taking the role in guaranteeing that after all these years his mother is ultimately suitably identified.

By the time of the 20th anniversary of her passing in August 2017, he wants a new memorial in place. What he has in mind is something permanent and notably distinctive from any present monument, and expected to be in London.

At the same time, some of the Princess’s familiar friends have similarly been looking at ways to mark next year’s date. They have been exploring the possibility of supporting backing for a life-size sculpture of Diana or a simple image of her head to be located in London.

It’s high time that Princess Diana got some recognition, after all, she was a notable figurehead in our society at the time, whilst she was living, and she did a number of excellent things, and whether the Royal family accept that or not, that is reality, and the public would not have it any other way.

With the passage of time, these supporters think the £3.5 million fountain has declined to attract the character of Diana.



They will, nevertheless, support anything Harry, and William, want to do, confident that Britain will ultimately have a suitable tribute to the Princess of Wales, a son’s recognition.

Israel’s Ill Treatment Of Palestinian Youngster’s


A film which has been created by a group of Australian reporters has fired a global complaint on Israel after it explicitly mentioned Tel Aviv’s practice of crucifixion upon Palestinian children.

The film named Stone Cold Justice reports how Palestinian kids, who have been caught and arrested by Israeli authorities, are reduced to bodily harm, pain and coerced into fake statements and forced into collecting data on Palestinian activists.


Australia’s foreign minister Julie Bishop has spoken out against Israeli’s treatment of cruelty saying that she was very worried about the charges of the abuse of Palestinian children.


Israel’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Yigal Palmor has reported the human rights abuses recorded in the film as offensive. However, rights organizations have crashed this report, stating that the Israelis are doing nothing to improve Tel Aviv’s strategy to hurt Palestinian children.


Last year a proclamation by the United Nations International Emergency Children’s Fund or UNICEF decided that Palestinian children are regularly targeted in night arrests and invasions of their habitats, intimidated with death and reduced to corporal injury, isolated imprisonment and sexual attack.

The film Stone Cold Justice has fired a universal objection about Israel’s handling of minors in Israeli prisons.

Nevertheless, rights organizations have scrutinized Tel Aviv for not doing anything to build a strategy that defends Palestinian kids facing arbitrary detention and cruelty.

A woman has declared that the Jewish land was given to them by word of honor god.


The description of the Promised Land was summoned in Negro holies as heaven or paradise and as a freedom from slaveholding, usually which can alone be attained by death.

The representation and expression have further been utilized in traditional culture, sermons and in speeches, such as the “I’ve Been to the Mountaintop” (1968) speech by Martin Luther King, Jr:

“I just want to do God’s will. And He’s allowed me to go up to the mountain. And I’ve looked over. And I’ve seen the Promised Land. I may not get there with you. But I want you to know tonight, that we, as a people, will get to the Promised Land. So I’m happy, tonight. I’m not worried about anything. I’m not fearing any man. Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord.”

The promise that is the source of the term is held in many verses of Genesis in the Torah. In Genesis 12:1 it is said:

The LORD had said to Abram, “Leave your country, your people and your father’s household and go to the land I will show you.”
and in Genesis 12:7:

The LORD appeared to Abram and told, “To your offspring, or seed I will give this land.”

Critics have noted many difficulties with this agreement and relevant ones:

It is to Abram’s descendants that the land will, in the future tense be provided, not to Abram directly neither there and then. Nevertheless, in Genesis 15:7 it is said: He further said to him, “I am the LORD, who brought you out from Ur of the Chaldeans to give you this land to take possession of it.” Nonetheless, how this line relates to the agreements is a subject of debate.

There is nothing in the promise to show God proposed it is implemented to Abraham’s bodily descendants unreservedly, solely to nobody but these descendants, exhaustively, to all of them, or for eternity.


Nevertheless, more than 40 years Israel has dominated the West Bank, but presently there are serious allegations that Palestinian children are being regularly targetted, captured and imprisoned in the struggle to dominate this argued region.

Furthermore, it’s this terror and coercion that makes this method work so efficiently. They never know when there is going to be this bang on the door in the middle of the night.

A new generation of malice in the making. Imagine in any principal city or in any other cultured community, daily late-night attacks on family homes by heavily equipped soldiers to take away children in blindfolds and handcuffs for questioning.

Imagine a military stockade where the prisoners incorporate children as young as twelve are in handcuffs. Such is the deformity of life, in a country of divided peace plans and very implanted hatreds among 2.5 million Palestinians and 350 thousand homesteaders following more than 40 years of military rule.

A UNICEF statement last year discovered that Palestinian children had been abused under questioning by Israeli defense teams, with death, bodily injury, isolated detention and sexual crimes on themselves or a family member, whilst demanding statements for supposed crimes, most commonly, stone throwing.

UNICEF calculates that over the foregoing decade, a percentage of 700 children a year have been arrested, questioned and processed through Israel’s military judiciary system.

This describes the way law is followed with respect to the children of the West Bank.

It’s a quiet nightfall in a tiny Palestinian community, whilst a 14-year-old boy and his family slumber. Quickly the night is destroyed, the Israeli armed forces are making an assault. The victim, the boy who they allege has cast stones at them. His mother remembers that moment.

Each soldier stood at the doorway of a room. The mum was questioning what did they want with him, and she was ordered to shut up. They began beating her son and dragging him out of bed. She informed them that he wanted to get dressed, so she gave him a coat to cover him but the soldier began making jokes and began laughing.

Husayn Zumaya maintains he’s done nothing illegal, but this starts an 18-day ordeal.

Husayn Zumaya stated, there was a large device with electrical cables on it, attached to the electricity. He wanted to give him an electric shock with it. He was forced to the ground and beaten. He further had a whip with a pipe which he was beaten with.

At the age of 15 years old, the life of a different boy has been turned upside down. He didn’t run off because he knew he hadn’t done anything illegal. They opened fire and hit him with three or four rubber bullets. He was also hit with a gas canister.

He spent the following 82 days in prison, starting with a cross-examination. They held electric batons, which they hit him with. One of the officers raised his disguise, and he had all charcoal covering his face and his eyes were all black. He would be talked to, and they would glare at him to frighten him, and they hit him, and they gave him electric shocks.

As a 14-year-old, another person has come up against Israel’s security services. They ordered him to sign papers, and he told him it’s in Hebrew, he couldn’t understand Hebrew, could they explain it to him? They told him it was for his release and that he needed to sign it. After he signed it at the court, he was shocked to find out that it was confession papers.


These boys are part of the new frontline in the Israeli-Palestinian struggle. They’re amongst the 700 Palestinian children brought each year before Israel’s military court.

They never know when there is going to be a bang on the door in the midst of the night and soldiers are going to command that they bring out their children and one of them is taken away.


On to this frontline has stepped Australian lawyer Gerard Horton, he left his practice as a Commercial law barrister in Sydney six years ago. He’s presently heading a crusade to stop a system under which Palestinian children have fewer rights than Israeli children, including being subjected to night-time arrests by heavily armed soldiers.

This has a disabling impact on whole communities and it’s that terror and coercion that makes the policy work so well, with comparatively fewer soldiers on the ground, therefore, it also makes it really a cost effective occupation.

Yigal Palmor stated that there is simply no policy, a policy to generate fear, there is no such thing, this is what came from his mouth. He stated the only policy is to keep law and order, that’s all, and that if there is no valence, there’s no enforcement.

Valence, as applied in psychology, particularly in addressing emotions, suggests the inherent attractiveness, positive valence or aversiveness, negative valence of an event, purpose, or situation.

Nevertheless, the word is further applied to identify and describe particular emotions. For instance, the emotions commonly referred to as negative, such as violence and fear, have a negative valence, and he stated if there is no valence, there is no enforcement.

Ambivalence is a state of having simultaneous adverse opinions, ideas, or attitudes towards something or persons, in the case, the Palestinians.
Said another way, ambivalence is the sense of having an opinion towards somebody or something that carries both positively and negatively valenced components.


However, President Barak Obama announced to Israeli’s last year that the problem will not resolve itself. He stated that we should put ourselves in their shoes, and see the world through their eyes. He announced it was not just that the Palestinian child cannot grow up in a land of their own, living their whole life under the occupation of a foreign militia that dominates the movements, not just of those young people, but their parents, their grandparents every single day.


Nevertheless, leaders of the Israeli settler movement like Daniella Weiss do not accept this. She stated that they came to a land where other people were living, however, she said this land was guaranteed to the Jewish nation by God. She stated, all the other people that live there need to accept Jewish sovereignty in the Promised Land, and this is the only way she see’s it. So, those who accept it, live happily, those who do not accept it, face confrontations.

Those encounters happen essentially adjacent to settlements. In 1967 Israel started seizing the West Bank, also known as the Palestinian areas. Since then, settlements, generally viewed as prohibited under international law have grown to control the West Bank.

Israel maintains they are not prohibited. Therefore, take a situation concerning two children in the West Bank casting stones, one a Palestinian child, the other an Israeli child living in the settlement. The Palestinian child will be prosecuted in a military jurisdiction, with far fewer freedoms and protections, while his Israeli equivalent living sometimes 500 meters away will be prosecuted in a juvenile justice system which satisfies international standards and complies, and is the kind of system you would expect in any western style government.

It is questionable when you recognize there are probably quite young children being detained in the early hours of the morning.


Leftenant Colonel Maurice Hirsh, the Israeli army officer who manages prosecutions at the military court told it’s, sadly, an operational requirement because of the general disruption of the peace that ensues when they attempt to carry out the rest through the day and the disinclination of the Palestinian people to cooperate with the Law enforcement agency.

To understand Israels two separate judicial methods you have to go to Hebron the biggest Palestinian city in the West Bank. There, 800 Israeli settlers live in the center of Hebron enveloped by 180 thousand Palestinians.


It used to be a flourishing Palestinian marketplace and the result of Israel’s control is clear, now it’s a ghost town, and Israeli soldiers will not permit Palestinians to walk along the streets. Palestinians maintain they have been driven out and countless buildings been taken over by the settlers guarded by soldiers.

One Palestinian man desires to be able to walk along the streets. He is from Hebron, and when questioned why he could not the soldier replied that was the order that he has got. The man asked the soldier, because he needed to walk past to go to the cemetery, so that he could attend his father’s grave, and the soldier said that he could not. It appears unusual, that any other person can wander through the streets, however, Palestinians can’t.



It’s early morning in Hebron and Palestinian children are walking to school when abruptly there is tear gas being discharged. The Israeli army announced that it was in response to stone throwing, the stone throwing wasn’t affirmed, but there were Israeli police coming together when suddenly they discharged tear gas in the direction of the children.

There was no provocation from the children who were attempting to bypass the gas. Their teachers said tear gas is fired there almost daily. Every day is similar to that, and the Israeli’s do it to defend their settlement, but the Palestinians simply want to study with their children, and the week before that they had to take children to the hospital because of the gas.

The police were approached however, the police would not divulge anything.

Hebron has long been a flashpoint, and what happens plainly there is one law for Israeli’s and one law for Palestinians is characteristic of the West Bank, and according to Yehuda Shaul who served there as an Israeli army commander said that the DNA of the military operations that is observed in Hebron is seen all over the West Bank.


Israeli forces’ casualties now stands at 61: military

Yehuda Shaul needed to end his silence, and 950 current and past Israeli combat soldiers are working to stop human rights violations. He told he’s never broken into houses in the middle of the night there in Jerusalem nor tore apart apartments, however, he stated in Hebron where he served for 14 months, 24/7, that’s what they did in order to make their presence known.

Last July one event shocked many. In the streets of Hebron, a 5-year-old boy, Wadi’a was pulled up by soldiers. An Israeli settler had asserted that the boy had tossed a stone at him, the boy’s friend tried to help him, and kept hold of his hand but the soldiers dragged him away and shoved the boy who was trying to help into a door.

The older boy spoke to Wadi’a and told him not to be afraid and that he was with him. The 5-year-old was hugging the older boy in terror and the older boy was upset, he had tears in his eyes but he stopped himself from crying. He simply gripped onto the younger boy.

Wadi’a told that he was simply playing outside, and then a car came. A man said that he had hurled a stone at the car. He said the Jewish man said that he cast a stone at him.

Wadi’a was taken by 6 soldiers but was freed after two hours. One settler making one assertion is able to stimulate this level of military interference upon a 5-year-old. When his father intervened, he is blindfolded.

Even though they know all of them, and they know they are occupants of the region, they do this because this is their way of driving them away, that’s their work, that is what they do. Wadi’a was asked that when he see’s an Israeli soldier in the street, what does he think, he answered that he is afraid of them, and when they took him into the van, he said that he was crying.

Yehuda Shaul stated that from his military days, he doesn’t even remember children, he told that he has some visions of Palestinian children when he broke into houses in the middle of the night and children began to cry, but they are the obscure recollections that Yehuda has from his military service, because simply the notion that there are children and adults is not the thought that you have there, and he stated that when he was in uniform, it was just them and the military.


Consider what you would do if your 5-year-old child was being taken by soldiers, even by your own police. Gaby Lasky is a leading Israeli lawyer who defends Palestinians. She said, if a 5-year-old had been taken by an authority that is not you, you would do everything in your ability to get your child back. Military courts are the long arm of occupation. We are not speaking about Courts of Justice, we are speaking about Courts of occupation.

Yehuda Shaul grew up thinking that actions as a Military in the occupied territories were there to defend Israel from terrorism, what he’s seen from his three years of service and 9 years of activism and breaking the silence following studying data of above 950 soldiers is that the central story is about keeping full military power over Palestinians.

Palestinians maintain the soldiers are working in harmony with the settlers. Settlers assault Palestinian children while soldiers stand by. Furthermore, a settler fires active ammo, hitting a Palestinian youth on the side of the head, again soldiers stand by.

When you see a settler attacking a Palestinian, soldiers orders are not to intervene.

Palestinian children encounter a threat on two aspects. Neither rests from the army and brutality from settlers. To get to school each day they must walk past a settler outstation, and strikes from settlers have become so serious that the army accompanies the children, but the school has closed early and the army has not turned up.

Presently, the children are on their own, their only security is an Israeli aide who believes that by bringing a camera he will discourage the settlers.

As a Jewish Israeli he can’t explain it in words since he feels somewhat bad since he’s a holocaust survivor since and his grandfather was a holocaust survivor, he was a sympathetic, he ran away for several years and all his family died in the holocaust and he doesn’t get it from one who has experienced from all atrocities how Israeli’s shifted to the people that are making other people suffer for Israel’s behaviour, it’s incredible.

Human behavior can be irrational at times since we are just really stupid people that require an armed force and have created a war on innocent people, just because they want to be on a stage.

As the intermittent battle continues in the Middle East, the quest for an impartial resolution must come to grips with the source of the dispute. The common reason is that, even if both sides are to blame, the Palestinians are illogical terrorists who have no point of view that merits listening to.

The situation, though, is that the Palestinians have a genuine complaint, their motherland for over a thousand years was taken, without their permission and mostly by force, during the conception of the state of Israel.

Furthermore, all succeeding violations, on both sides, inevitably result from this fundamental violation.

The approved Zionist situation is that they showed up in Palestine in the late 19th century to reclaim their tribal motherland. Jews purchased land and began developing the Jewish population there. They were faced with increasingly powerful resistance from the Palestinian Arabs, probably originating from the Arabs’ intrinsic anti-Semitism.

The Zionists were then obliged to protect themselves and, in one form or another, this same position remains up to today.

The dilemma with this story is that it is just not correct. What actually occurred was that the Zionist movement, from the start, looked forward to a substantially total dispossession of the native Arab people so that Israel could be a totally Jewish state or as much as was reasonable.

Land acquired by the Jewish National Fund was held in the name of the Jewish people and could never be sold or even leased back to Arabs, a position which remains to the present.

The Arab population, as it grew more conscious of the Zionists’ plans, vigorously questioned additional Jewish immigration and land purchasing since it posed a real and immediate threat to the very survival of Arab society in Palestine.

Because of this competition, the whole Zionist scheme never could have been accomplished without the armed backing of the British. The broad bulk of the inhabitants of Palestine, by the way, had been Arabic since the seventh century A.D, over 1200 years.

In short, Zionism was based on a flawed, colonialist world opinion that the rights of the native settlers didn’t matter. The Arabs’ hostility to Zionism wasn’t based on anti-Semitism but preferably on a completely rational concern of the dispossession of their people.

Seems like they existed pretty freely amongst one another before Zionists came along and threw a spanner in the works and declared all-out hostilities toward the Palestinians. What happened to love thy neighbor, now it’s let’s fake to love you, while we blow you all up, now they simply blow each other up, including their children, parents, grandparents, and other mother f*ckers they can get their hands on.

Merely to make things quite apparent, when the Jews and Zionists are all dead, you can’t take the land with you, it will still be there when you are dead and buried. Will it make you live longer, of course not, will it get you into the Kingdom of heaven, of course not?

Thou shalt not kill, that’s what is states in the Testament, I’m sure I’ve read it someplace before on my ramblings, only my wanderings as a Jew did not mean I could murder a child or an innocent grandmother. My hands are clean, I didn’t kill anyone because I fancied a bit of land, and I stamped my feet like a spoilt child because I couldn’t have it.

Did I get out my AK47 and blow somebodies brains out, no I didn’t because I’m not a greedy child with nothing else better to do with my time. Yes, I’ll be shunned for writing this article, but who cares, eventually death will take its toll, and I might even get to those pearly gates, you just never know, but even if I don’t, at least I’ll not have blood on my hands.


Of course, I don’t believe in God as such, but I do believe this. This land that we live on is not ours, it does not belong to us, it is here for us to live upon in unity and peace, to sustain and manage, so that prospective generations can live on it in union and balance, the circle of life, to go round and round, until it all ends.

It doesn’t really belong to anyone, it’s on loan, however, we plainly appear to want to tarnish it as much as possible because as human beings, we are really greedy people that want more and more.


There are specific laws that we were given so that we could live by them, they were called the 10 Commandments. I don’t honestly know if they ever truly existed. Sorry, I don’t have a crystal ball to hand, all I do know is that they have been handed down over centuries, perhaps for a special purpose because somebody or something recognized that when life was formed or designed, it was created with one significant defect, and that was a total and absolute indulgence.

To fight for a country that actually isn’t yours, to murder innocent people is genocide, but if you called an Israeli Jew Hitler, I believe they would get slightly upset.

Whilst there has been the recent criticism of those taking the view that Israel is perpetrating genocide against Palestinians, there is a long history of human rights research and legal study that confirms the contention.

Leading scholars of the international law crime of genocide and human rights authorities take the view that Israel’s tactics toward the Palestinian people could form a kind of genocide. Those policies range from the 1948 mass murder and displacement of Palestinians to a half-century of military rule and, correspondingly, the discriminatory legal regime ruling Palestinians, repeated military attacks on Gaza, and official Israeli reports explicitly supporting the removal of Palestinians.


Genocide is a word that has both sociological and legal definition. The word genocide was invented in 1944 by a Jewish Polish legal scholar, Raphael Lemkin. For Lemkin, the term does not necessarily mean mass murders.

More frequently, genocide points to a coordinated system directed at the removal of the fundamental foundations of the life of social groups so that these groups die and perish like plants that have suffered a disease. The end may be achieved by the coerced disintegration of political and social institutions, of the culture of the people, of their language, their national feelings, and their belief.

It may be achieved by wiping out all basis of individual protection, freedom, well-being, and dignity. When these means fail the machine gun can always be used as a last option. Genocide is directed against a national group as an entity and the assault on individuals is only secondary to the annihilation of the national group to which they belong.

Following Lemkin’s first citation of the word, it has got a political, social, and legal interest. For political experts, historians, and sociologists, genocide is recognized as a primary example of collective violence, with a unique spot in the rainbow of political brutality, armed opposition, and conflict, of which it is normally regarded as a part.

From a legal view, genocide, like the crime against mankind of murder, is an international violation identified by the particular intention to separate into a group on perceived grounds through a sequence of actions or omissions usually reflected in and managed within State systems.

Whilst different in scope, both genocide and murder, reduce a person to their identification with or membership in a gathering, but further attack the gathering itself. Abuse criminalizes the denial of basic freedoms for members of the group, and genocide criminalizes the most violent degree of prejudice, attempts to truly defeat the crowd.


According to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, genocide involves many actions performed with the intention to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group as such, comprising, killing branches of the group, causing severe physical or mental injury to branches of the group.

Intentionally inflicting on the assembly conditions of life determined to bring about its physical devastation in whole or in part, and forcing actions designed to stop births inside the group.

This interpretation is shown in Article 6 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), which has authority over violations happening in the area of the State of Palestine since June 13, 2014.


The Genocide Convention was addressed in the repercussions of World War II and the aversions of the Holocaust, mainly to stop and limit such horrors in the tomorrow and, failing that, to discipline those accountable.

The Convention, therefore, granted a legal structure that explicitly recognizes the nature of the offense of genocide, regardless of the political, social, or cultural changes in which the offense may be endeavored or carried out and despite the particular qualities, stage, or scale of the genocidal method.

The Holocaust established the terms by which a kind of widespread or prevalent brutality toward a group might be legitimately named genocide as a broad sociological thought as it need not indicate a connection to any other particular event.

Scholars of genocide have recognized it as a crime different from other kinds of conflict, killing, brutality, prejudice, and control. Genocidal action aims not just to contain, manage, or subordinate a society, but to destroy and divide up its social continuation.

Therefore genocide is defined, not by a singular kind of brutality, but by general and prevalent brutality. It is noted that settler colonial regimes are structurally predisposed to genocide, and can coddle in genocidal moments when they become defeated by the resistance of a settled or occupied people.

The word genocide has been applied to characterize the mass killing of Armenians by the Ottomans, Stalin’s removal of Chechens, Ingush Tartars, and Jews from the U.S.S.R., the elimination of Jews and Hungarians from Romania, and Italy’s attempts to free Slovenes and Croats from the Dalmatian coast.

There have been successful prosecutions of people for genocide occurring out of attempts to destroy the Tutsi people in Rwanda in 1994 and Srebrenica in Bosnia-Herzegovina in 1995.

Many leading human rights professionals, advocates, and scholars have declared that Israel’s tactics and operations with regard to the Palestinian people have resulted to a kind of genocide.


With regard to the creation of the Israeli nation in 1948, there has been a strong scholarly discussion about if the settlement of Jews and the removal of Palestinians in Mandate Palestine could be defined as genocide. We can assume that pre-war Zionism entailed the construction of an incipiently genocidal comprehension towards Arab culture.

Israel penetrated lacking an overarching plan, so that its specific genocidal assaults began situationally and incrementally, inside local as well as national decisions. On this reckoning, this was a little decentered, webbed genocide, growing in interaction with the Palestinian and Arab enemy, in the context of war.


In 2010, the Journal of Genocide Studies entertained a discussion between Martin Shaw and another leading scholar of genocide, on whether the name genocide could be reasonably implemented to the Israeli behavior towards Palestinians, especially the removal and murder of Arabs in 1948.

The two scholars took vastly diverse views on the issue, but the journal denied grievances from some areas that it was illegal, or worse, a biased issue to pose and question at all.

The Palestinians have been the victims of genocide as outlined by the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.

For over the past six and one-half decades, the Israeli administration and its forerunners in law, the Zionist agencies, forces, and terrorist groups, have ruthlessly executed a precise and extensive military, political, religious, economic, and cultural attack with the intention to destroy in large part the national, ethnical, racial, and various religious group, Jews versus Muslims and Christians, creating the Palestinian people.

When the general population approved legal laws that would control the operations of occupying authorities while further defending the justices of occupied peoples and nations/states, it was recognized that military rule would be a short-lived necessity assistant to armed struggle and that the occupying army would be removed at the end of the fight.

Israel’s continued aggressive control of the West Bank, comprising East Jerusalem, and Gaza for 50 years far transcends the sort of control that encouraged the formulation of legal practices of control contained in international law.

Given the apparently robust reality of the Israeli invasion of the West Bank and Gaza, some human rights specialists, including Israeli historian Ilan Pappé, have warned of an incremental genocide of Palestinians and the final end of Palestinians as a national group.

This incremental genocide within the methods and practices that have both supported and accepted as the endorsements of Israel’s control is achieved, they contend, by a normalization of the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territory and the expulsion or absorption of the national organization of people who identify as Palestinian.

International legislation is explicit that an occupying authority may not annex the people or area it controls.

There’s no uncertainty here that this is incremental genocide. It’s been going on for an extended time, the murder of people, the amazingly poor conditions of life, the exiles that have gone on from Lydda in 1947 and ‘48, when 700 or more communities in Palestine were destroyed, and in the exiles that proceeded from that time until today.

It’s true and necessary to identify it for what it is. Furthermore, we need to highlight today that these crimes are a component of a larger collection of cruel actions by Israel organizing international atrocities, carried out by Israel over numerous years, going back to at least 1947 and 1948.

They encompass violations that aren’t discussed that much in the media or the newspapers, the atrocities of genocide, violations upon mankind, and apartheid. These crimes can be contested in the International Criminal Court and are defined there.

The Russell Tribunal on Palestine, a nongovernmental people’s body made up of leading international human rights masters and advocates, gathered between November 2010 and September 2014 to examine the issue of human rights crimes in the connection of the Israeli invasion of the West Bank, comprising East Jerusalem, and Gaza.

It took testimony and pondered particularly on the issue of if Israel may have perpetrated genocide in connection to the Palestinian people. The panel decided that some Israeli settlers and leaders may have been guilty in some cases of the separate violation of provocation to genocide, which is defined in Article 3(c) of the Genocide Convention.

The combined result of the long-standing administration of cumulative suffering in Gaza seems to inflict conditions of life thought to bring about the incremental removal of the Palestinians from a society in Gaza. The Tribunal highlights the potential for an administration of oppression to become genocidal as a result.


With regard to Israel’s most recent military offensive, the so-called Operation Protective Edge set upon Gaza in the summer of 2014, important human rights authorities showed concern that the military operations constituted a breach of the international humanitarian law as included in the Geneva Conventions.


Amnesty International announced a declaration declaring an International Criminal Court (ICC) examination was crucial to shatter the perception of impunity which kept alive the commission of war crimes and crimes against humankind in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

The case for such action is made all the more enthralling in the knowledge of the ongoing serious breach of international humanitarian legislation being perpetrated by all individuals to the prevailing hatreds in the Gaza Strip and Israel.

The ICC has authority over genocide, and the U.N. Special Advisers on the Prevention of Genocide published a declaration two weeks into the 2014 attack that they were outraged by the blatant use of hatred discourse in the social media, especially upon the Palestinian people, observing that people have distributed communications that could be dehumanizing to the Palestinians and have ordered the killing of members of this organization, whilst warning all that motive to perpetrate murder atrocities is forbidden under international legislation.




Al-Haq, the oldest Palestinian Human Rights group, determined that severe breaches of international law were perpetrated in the course of the 2014 Israeli offensive against Gaza. Al-Haq, simultaneously with other Palestinian human rights groups the Palestinian Center for Human Rights, Al-Mezan, and Aldameer presented a legal dossier to the International Criminal Court asking it to initiate an inquiry and prosecution into the atrocities against mankind and war violations perpetrated throughout the course of Israel’s 2014 Gaza attack.

The violations suggested for prosecution by these human rights organizations include genocide.


Handfuls of Holocaust survivors, collectively with hundreds of offspring of Holocaust survivors and victims, blamed Israel of genocide for the deaths of more than 2,000 Palestinians in Gaza throughout the 2014 Israeli military attack on Gaza, “Operation Protective Edge.


Hundreds of people perished in the Holocaust, and it’s wrong that Israel should be doing the equivalent to the Palestinians, we should have learned from what occurred in World War 2, and it should have made us understand that it should never happen again.

Nevertheless, it appears that we have not learned at all since the Israeli’s are hell bent on destroying the Palestinian people and they are making them suffer. This home that the Israeli’s and the Palestinian’s live on should belong to both, they should both be permitted to walk on it, live on it, work on it, labor on it, it should belong to everyone.

After all, they can’t take it with them, but they believe that it belongs to them by virtue, so they go about murdering innocent men, women, and children in the process to acquire a portion of land.

We swore that these crimes would never happen again, but we appear to want to hold these people to ransom when all they want is some freedom, but now it’s too late since this country is steeped in conflict, stirred by hatred and disorder.

Their departure from the truth and the notoriety that they accomplish is all the recognition that they require, the playhouse of death, to ensconce prejudice which can never have a positive result. If the Palestinians protest they then become a scapegoat, but it appears more than that now.

To drag innocent children from their beds at night whilst they are asleep because Israeli soldiers have said that they have launched stones at them is a bit extreme. It’s a military organization and nothing more, to browbeat and abuse through unadulterated pleasure, and as we obtain the information of this we must recognize that this conduct is just corrupt.

Ultimately, there will be no way back, since there must be a crucial moment when we must stop this war once and for all. This fight for land must end!

I do have sympathy for both sides, however, when it comes down to it, it is complete and absolute selfishness that makes this battle go on. This country is plentiful, and many people can live there peacefully if they so wished to do so, but they have made a complex situation into a war zone.

There are two situation’s that could befall them, we could either pull out and let them get on with it, or if they can’t all live together in agreement, maybe Israeli’s or Palestinian’s should not live there at all, and they should both be eliminated.


Nevertheless, genocide is unconstitutional, and that would never happen, however, we have no difficulty letting them annihilate each other, torture children, and take children from their beds in the middle of the night, that appears to be acceptable. The only way to triumph is to allow the Palestinian’s to have what they want, or for somebody to come in and tell each, the Israeli’s and Palestinian’s what they can have, and that if there is controversy in the land they will be incarcerated – each and every one of them.

Prejudice ferments in this land, and we must recognize that this is a no-win situation. There is no fault finding here, nobody is right and nobody is in the wrong, both parties believe that it belongs to them, however, they are so wrong, and I decline to accept that each side truly wants to fight unendingly.

Giving Food To The People And Aged


I don’t usually here of people putting their hands in their pockets to do something nice, and it doesn’t even have to be about giving money, simply being there for somebody over Christmas is enough. However, one chip shop in Birmingham unlocked its doors on Christmas Day to feed the destitute and aging.

Brothers Asef and Hamid Faqiri delved into their own pockets to give a turkey meal with all the accessories. There was additionally to be free fish and chips for those craving anything simpler. The brothers have observed so many destitute people around them that they really wanted to do anything to help them.

There are also many old people who don’t have any families and will be on their own on Christmas Day. So they chose to open up primarily for them, to induce some Christmas joy. Staff prepared and served up a legendary turkey feast in takeaway cartons to hand out to anybody who turned up between 1 pm and 4 pm.

A sign was put up in the shop window announcing the event. It was distributed extensively on social media and the brothers further asked their patrons to spread the word.

This is very inspiring, and I have not observed compassion like this in a really long time, and I give these brothers an enormous thumbs up, for what we call kindness towards another human being. The British people would never conceive of doing anything so thoughtful and kind, but these brothers have moved oceans to feed the less fortunate and aged who were are going to be on their own at Christmas.